subject:"\[Bug target\/93183\] SVE does not use neg as conditional"

[Bug target/93183] SVE does not use neg as conditional

2021-10-19 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/93183] SVE does not use neg as conditional

2021-10-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4c18b98127087d7f14062b81bc678f0589cd36 commit r12-4493-g6b4c18b98127087d7f14062b81bc678f0589cd36 Author: prathamesh.kulkarni

[Bug target/93183] SVE does not use neg as conditional

2021-10-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20dcda98ed376cb61c74b2c71656f99c671ec9ce commit r12-4470-g20dcda98ed376cb61c74b2c71656f99c671ec9ce Author: prathamesh.kulkarni

[Bug target/93183] SVE does not use neg as conditional

2021-10-04 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > We get: > > .L3: > > ld1bz0.b, p0/z, [x1, x3] > > movprfx z2, z0 > >