https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cel at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #7 from Ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
--- Comment #6 from Carl Love ---
Yea, I like that a bit better. It is a bit shorter, mine was a bit verbose.
I updated the patch to print:
-mlong-double- Use -mlong-double-64 for 64-bit IEEE floating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yeah, not sure. A user can just do `-mlong-double-128`, and will get whichever
128-bit format is the default. That is the "old" way, when we only had the
ibm128 format, and it will be the new way too,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
--- Comment #4 from Carl Love ---
Created attachment 47982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47982&action=edit
patch to update -mlong-double-NN description
Attached the proposed patch so I will not lose it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cel at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from Ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That isn't documentation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91638
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|