https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
g.peterh...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
--- Comment #6 from g.pete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
--- Comment #4 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
#include
#include
int main(const int argc, const char** argv)
{
using value_type = int64_t;
using array_type = std::array;
array_type a, b;
for (size_t i=0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
--- Comment #3 from g.peterh...@t-online.de ---
Am 15.05.19 um 21:20 schrieb glisse at gcc dot gnu.org:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
>
> --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
>> copy's use only sse-registers and never highe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Ah, I see, this is a DUP or PR 89226 then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
> copy's use only sse-registers and never higher
What do you mean by that? Do you want AVX? Then you should let the compiler
know that they are available (for instance -march=native).
