https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
It is fixed for all GCC versions I checked: all the up-to-date versions of 4.9,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9 from Homebrew.
Also, I recently updated from High Sierra to Mojave, and the new clang is:
scima-mh421-20:Fas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mikael Slevinsky from comment #10)
> I can confirm this is fixed, thank you!
Great, for which GCC versions is it fixed?
> P.S. the exact processor type is a Xeon(R) W-2191B CPU @ 2.30GHz.
thank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
I can confirm this is fixed, thank you!
P.S. the exact processor type is a Xeon(R) W-2191B CPU @ 2.30GHz.
scima-mh421-20:Desktop mikael$ sysctl -a |grep cpu
hw.ncpu: 36
hw.activecpu: 36
hw.physicalcpu:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
does this problem still exist?
Please can you give me the exact processor type?
in terminal:
sysctl -a |grep cpu
and find the actual intel part number.
===
It looks to me like there could be a misinterpre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #7 from MCCCS ---
The problem was that the LLVM assembler required -mavx512f. I've researched it
and found that this LLVM bug was fixed months and shipped with LLVM 7. Apple
updates Xcode's LLVM with one year delay, and it should be f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
MCCCS changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment #5 from MCCCS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
I'm not sure if this answers your question, but compiling the same program
(modifying 8 to 128 to tease the compiler into using zmm registers) with
clang-6 works fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Slevinsky ---
I'm not so sure. Consider the following minimal test file:
#include
#include
int main(void) {
double * X, * Y, * Z;
X = (double *) calloc(8, sizeof(double));
Y = (double *) call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|c
13 matches
Mail list logo
