https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Jan 11 05:13:57 2018
New Revision: 256477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83781 - Bootstrap failed on x86 with --with-arch=core
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 43094
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43094&action=edit
Preliminary patch.
I'm testing the attached patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
On i686, it failed with
--prefix=/usr/8.0.0 --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared
--with-demangler-in-ld --enable-libmpx i686-linux --with-fpmath=sse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
The gcc/hsa-dump.c warning doesn't seem to correspond to the latest sources.
hsa_seg_name() returns one of a number of short strings, the longest being
"UNKNOWN_SEGMENT" but the warning says the %s argument c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 43093
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43093&action=edit
x86_64-linux tests summary.
My x864_64 bootstrap and regression test run of the patch succeeded with the
attache
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
>
> r256454 is OK and r25646 failed. It may be caused by r256457.
Oops. r256463 failed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83781
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, diagnostic
Target|
