[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-04-26 Thread sbansal at ciena dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 --- Comment #10 from Sumit --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9) Thanks Segher for your comment. I have gone through the changes and seems like they are relevant to "volatile bitfield". Just wanted to confirm (double check) if the

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-04-26 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- [ Please remove irrelevant parts of the email when replying to bugzilla mail ]. https://gcc.gnu.org/r205896 tells you this commit resolved four PRs: PR middle-end/23623 PR middle-end/48

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-04-25 Thread sbansal at ciena dot com
? Thanks. Regards, Sumit -Original Message- From: segher at gcc dot gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 12:12 AM To: Bansal, Sumit Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 Segher

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-03-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-01-10 Thread sbansal at ciena dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 --- Comment #6 from Sumit --- mstrict-align does not seems to help. Only aligning them forcefully does work. ome_CardCfgPxfp_t xfpPecInfo __attribute__((aligned(4))); ome_CardCfgPsfp_t sfpPecInfo __attribute__

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-01-09 Thread sbansal at ciena dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 --- Comment #5 from Sumit --- PACK_SUFFIX_ALWAYS_PACK is defined as __attribute__ ((__packed__)). But each individual element in the structure is of 4 bytes. I understand that 4.8.x is not supported any more but we have progressed our developme

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- If PACK_PREFIX_ALWAYS_PACK is containing __attribute__((packed)) this bug is invalid if the pointers wvlgthMin do not have packed pointed-to type. As always without a full testcase it's hard to guess.

[Bug target/83748] Local variables not aligned to word boundary

2018-01-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc Status|UNCONFIRMED