subject:"\[Bug target\/82012\] \[8 Regression\] libitm build fails for s390x\-linux\-gnu"

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-09-27 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-09-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 4 Sep 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-09-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-09-01 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Sep 1 15:58:05 2017 New Revision: 251601 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251601&root=gcc&view=rev Log: S/390: PR82012: Implement CAN_INLINE_P target hook. TARGET_CAN_INLINE

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-30 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On August 30, 2017 10:24:09 AM GMT+02:00, "krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 > >--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- >(In reply to rguent..

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-30 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) ... > IPA computes this for us, but only somewhat as it looks for FP expressions > only (hopefully taking all inline asm as containing FP expressions) but > n

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 > > --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comm

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-29 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > Not sure. The user might be deliberately expecting an error when > such function is called from wrong target context. The function > might contain inline

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 > > --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug target/82012] [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu

2017-08-29 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) ... > inline int __attribute__((always_inline)) foo () { return 0; } > int __attribute__((target("soft-float"))) test () { return foo (); } > > > s390 misses t