[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2018-06-22 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2017-05-11 Thread aivchenk at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Ivchenko --- (In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #4) > We hit function pointer propagation issues before and chkp_redirect_edge > with corresponding code in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee appeared to handle > them.

[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2017-05-11 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- We hit function pointer propagation issues before and chkp_redirect_edge with corresponding code in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee appeared to handle them. Why doesn't it work in this case?

[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2017-05-11 Thread aivchenk at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko --- The problem here is that when CHKP is instrumenting call statement "i();" it doesn't know that it's a builtin call. When optimizations come into play, namely ccp pass, it becomes known that the call is t

[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2017-02-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UN

[Bug target/79634] ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490

2017-02-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org,