https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #12 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Sun Dec 11 23:37:17 2016
New Revision: 243534
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243534&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-12-11 Bill Schmidt
PR target/78695
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch under test:
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Excellent, thanks.
I am out of the office today but will have a look at this tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
still seen with r243430, but you need -fstack-protector or
-fstack-protector-strong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
gcc configured with
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
--program-suffix=-7 --program-prefix=powerpc64le-linux-gnu- --enable-shared
--enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Still no repro with bootstrap compiler.
wschmidt@genoa:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/gcc -S -O3 pr78695.c
wschmidt@genoa:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/wschmidt/gcc/install/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Also does not reproduce with a debug compiler at r243219:
wschmidt@genoa:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/gcc -S -O3 pr78695.c
wschmidt@genoa:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/wsch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
The offending line appears to be
rtx_insn *and_insn = DF_REF_INSN (base_def_link->ref);
which would seem to indicate an inconsistency in the dataflow information at
this point. It would be good to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yeah, I can't reproduce this either (r243264). Do you have local
modifications?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
