[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-11-20 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-11-20 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Nov 20 20:10:28 2017 New Revision: 254968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254968&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Don't touch below the stack pointer (PR77687) With the 32-b

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-09-20 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Sep 20 21:48:31 2017 New Revision: 253033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253033&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Don't touch below the stack pointer (PR77687) With the 32-b

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-06-15 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Olivier Hainque changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-03-03 00:00:00 |2017-6-15 Known to work|7.0

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-03-03 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-03-03 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2017-01-31 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #4 from hainque at adacore dot com --- Thanks again for your help on this Segher! > On Jan 27, 2017, at 01:54 , segher at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 > > Segher Boessenkool cha

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2016-11-28 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Nov 29 05:29:47 2016 New Revision: 242949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242949&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Make deallocation of a large frame work (PR77687) If we use

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2016-10-26 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Hainque --- Thanks for stepping in Segher ! Much appreciated :-) FWIW, I have just attached the bandaid patch we're currently using on our gcc-6 based compilers. It's more brutal than the original suggestion on the re

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

2016-10-26 Thread hainque at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Hainque --- Created attachment 39899 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39899&action=edit bandaid patch we're currently using