[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

2012-01-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-01-30 17:00:45 UTC --- On 1/29/2012 5:39 PM, steven at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Perhaps this should be closed as WONTFIX? This enhancement should be done. It appears both the 32 and 64-bit target

[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

2012-01-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

2006-04-10 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-04-10 20:17 --- Subject: Re: gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0 > Boooiinngg... > > Or, is anyone working on this? I'm not. Note that the HP code is using 64-bit registers and instructions in 32-bi

[Bug target/7625] gcc pessimized 64-bit % operator on hppa2.0

2006-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-10 19:49 --- Boooiinngg... Or, is anyone working on this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7625