https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #2)
> (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1)
> > Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed
> > from GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
> >
> > No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #1)
> Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed
> from GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
>
> Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64*|arm*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72738
--- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh ---
Testcase needs a #include to compile, but otherwise confirmed from
GCC 4.9 through to trunk.
Note that it isn't immediately clear that this is valid code - operations on
poly128_t other than vreinterpret
