https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #15)
> MyMinV2 returns a double, not a __m128d. I tried to read what the ABI says
> about the unused upper part of SSE registers when passing/returning a double
> and couldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> > Since for MyMinV1 we generate no move at all, then that code should also be
> > valid for MyMinV2 (no issue with sNaN in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> > As I told you in the other PR, movq is *NOT* what the PRs are asking for, it
>
> See the subject of this PR.
1) I know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> As I told you in the other PR, movq is *NOT* what the PRs are asking for, it
See the subject of this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Apr 18 19:40:30 2016
New Revision: 235169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235169&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Optimize load double into xmm with zero_extend
"movq" should used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 38303
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38303&action=edit
A patch for _mm_set_sd
We should use "movq" instead of "movsd" for _mm_set_sd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Petr from comment #3)
> Is there any workaround guys?
>
> I was looking for some built-in that would allow me just cast `double` to
> `__m128d` without going through `_mm_set_sd()`, but leaving th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
double MyMinV2(double a, double b) {
double undef = undef;
__m128d x;
__m128d y;
asm ("" : "=x" (x) : "0" (a));
asm ("" : "=x" (y) : "0" (b));
return _mm_cvtsd_f64(_mm_min_sd(x, y));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
--- Comment #3 from Petr ---
Is there any workaround guys?
I was looking for some built-in that would allow me just cast `double` to
`__m128d` without going through `_mm_set_sd()`, but leaving the high part
undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70708
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
CC|
15 matches
Mail list logo
