[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-07-02 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-06-30 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-04-29 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Fri Apr 29 17:20:36 2016 New Revision: 235646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235646&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69810 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (EXTQI): Don't al

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-23 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Tue Feb 23 22:28:23 2016 New Revision: 233648 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233648&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69810 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (zero_extendqi2_dot): Convert fro

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-22 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-22 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- Created attachment 37755 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37755&action=edit extqihi patch Because this idiom occurs so rarely (like never, except for an artificial csmith testcase :-), t

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-22 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn --- The bug definitely predated the EXTQI change. It was introduced when Red Hat added the splitters for non-cr0 compares. EXTQI is used for plain zero_extendqi2 and extendqi2. zero_extendqihi2 and extendqihi

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-22 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- It also happens with 4.8, which does not have the EXTQI patch yet, and not the WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS either. It wasn't hidden, just no one ever noticed :-)

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-21 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- The patch introducing the EXTQI stuff did -(define_insn "" - [(set (match_operand:CC 2 "cc_reg_operand" "=x,?y") - (compare:CC (sign_extend:HI (match_operand:QI 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "r,r") -

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-21 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- The following patch fixes the ICE Index: rs6000.md === --- rs6000.md (revision 232439) +++ rs6000.md (working copy) @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ (

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-21 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

2016-02-19 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|