https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #14)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
>
> >
> > My patch from yesterday makes no difference here, but what's funny is,
> > that the set register wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
>
> My patch from yesterday makes no difference here, but what's funny is,
> that the set register was originally r138 but now the dump says
> "set (reg/v:SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #11)
> I must admit, that I don't know what I am doing here,
> ... but this (completely untested) patch seems to fix the ICE:
> (and at least my linux kernel compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I must admit, that I don't know what I am doing here,
... but this (completely untested) patch seems to fix the ICE:
(and at least my linux kernel compiles without ICE now)
--- lra-assigns.c.jj2015-07-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE started with:
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Sep 1 19:37:52 2015 +
2015-09-01 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/61578
* lra-lives.c (process_bb_lives): Process move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #7)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> > Perhaps a bisection to the revision that started this could shed some light
>
> absolutely, but my compu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #6)
> Perhaps a bisection to the revision that started this could shed some light
absolutely, but my computer powers are too limited for that. could you help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Perhaps a bisection to the revision that started this could shed some light
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
necessary compiler options to trigger the ICE: -O2 and -mapcs
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -O2 -mapcs -S kernel-ice.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|ICE compiling Li
15 matches
Mail list logo
