[Bug target/67510] x86: Faster code is possible for integer absolute value

2024-03-07 Thread pcordes at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510 --- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Fixed by r10-5498 and r11-5429 . Looks ok for -mtune=generic and non-Intel, but MOV/NEG isn't ideal on some microarchitectures. We still aren't using CMOV for -m

[Bug target/67510] x86: Faster code is possible for integer absolute value

2021-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/67510] x86: Faster code is possible for integer absolute value

2015-09-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|