[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-08-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #59 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #58) > Oh, and according to the Debian changelog, it must be a regression that was > introduced somewhere between r218987 and r222750 of the gc

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-08-20 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #58 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Oh, and according to the Debian changelog, it must be a regression that was introduced somewhere between r218987 and r222750 of the gcc-4.9 branch. Currently, the buildds did not build any snaps

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-26 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-26 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #56 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #55) > Can we close this as fixed? Yes.

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-25 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #55 from Oleg Endo --- Can we close this as fixed?

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-10 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #54 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #53) > (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52) > We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for gcc-5 was done > and we get a chance

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-10 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #53 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52) We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for gcc-5 was done and we get a chance to commit it: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg008

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-09 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #52 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #51) BTW, I've already committed the patch in c#37 for gcc-5 for this PR. The backport patch for PR/66780 is still in test for gcc-5.

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-09 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #51 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49) > Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch > is currently frozen? It's too late, I think.

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-09 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #50 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #49) > Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch > is currently frozen? Btw, the main reason for most of these segfault

[Bug target/66563] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

2015-07-09 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #49 from Matthias Klose --- Kaz, please could you propose these patches for 5.2 too, even if the branch is currently frozen?