https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I've just been notified that the bug is fixed in Xcode 7.3.1.
> Will try that as soon as it hits the Appstore.
I have Xcode 7.3.1 since May 4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #35 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31)
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #30)
> > With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
> >
> > I've filed bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #34 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, for bugs that aren't fixed, sometimes we work around them. We can use this
bug to track things like the vendor bug status (fixed or not), and potential
workarounds. Plus, we can list this bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32)
> reduced testcase:
..however this is not "our" bug, so there's no known reason to keep this PR
open, right?
.. if no-one objects by Monday 30th, then let's close i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe ---
reduced testcase:
.text
.align 4,0x90
.globl _choose_tmpdir
_choose_tmpdir:
sbbl$3+_vartmp, %esi
ret
.space 254
.const
.align 2
_vartmp:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #30)
> With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
>
> I've filed bug
>
> 23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
I've filed bug
23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation ld cannot handle
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
I've done some more digging and found that the switch from a gas-derived
as in Xcode 6.4 to the LLVM-bas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 36837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36837&action=edit
.i/.s/.o for 32-bit link failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Are there any symbols in .text? If so, this is wrong. All symbols have to
> have 1 or more bytes after them. This is just how the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> Ok, I'll dig up the details later today. It may well be related to a
> command line tools upgraded corresponding to Xcode 7.x.
Here's what I found: in stage2, linking gcj fails with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #22)
>> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> > Is this still a problem?
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #22)
> > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Is this still a problem?
>
> I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is this still a problem?
I'm bootstrapping gcc mainline on Mac OS X 10.11.2 Beta just fine. The
only problem I'm seeing for quite a w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #20)
> Is this still a problem?
I don't believe so - I've bootstrapped 5.2.1(r230380) all langs incl. Ada and
Java.
Likewise 4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is this still a problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 63831, which changed state.
Bug 63831 Summary: [5 Regression] r217292 causes segfaults with -MM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 64023, which changed state.
Bug 64023 Summary: [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using
gcc as the bootstrap compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 63703, which changed state.
Bug 63703 Summary: [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on
powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 63534, which changed state.
Bug 63534 Summary: [5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86_64/i686-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Bug 63773 depends on bug 63622, which changed state.
Bug 63622 Summary: [5.0 Regression] Bootstrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1[34]
after revision r216305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #19 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #18)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> > interesting - so that also implies it will be affected by the bootstrap
> > compiler (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #17)
> interesting - so that also implies it will be affected by the bootstrap
> compiler (although, of course, that pretty much has to be GCC for Ada). I
> m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #16)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > … the second issue - which is that we need a -B…. option for each library
> > path that will be used for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> … the second issue - which is that we need a -B…. option for each library
> path that will be used for spec-substitution (.a for .dylib)
The necessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #14)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13)
> > There is still a bootstrapping issue with libcc1 when bootstrapping with gcc
> > 4.9:
>
> Regar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #14 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13)
> There is still a bootstrapping issue with libcc1 when bootstrapping with gcc
> 4.9:
Regarding that one, it should be fixed in the top-level Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
There is still a bootstrapping issue with libcc1 when bootstrapping with gcc
4.9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00731.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
With the commits of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00357.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00370.html, the darwin bootstrap
should be fully restored on darwin13 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-11-07 00:00:00 |2014-11-11
--- Comment #11 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Regression testing on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-11/msg00806.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #8)
Successfully bootstrapped with same configure options at same revision on...
x86_64-apple-darwin11 against Xcode 4.6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Bootstrap tested at r217238 with the remaining uncommitted patches applied
using...
Configured with: ../gcc-5.0-20141107/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0 --mandir=/sw/share/man
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #6)
Sorry, stupid typo on my part in the latest build. Indeed, with the three
patches mentioned, my build is proceeding fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> (In reply to howarth from comment #4)
> > Did you apply the PA ICF aliasing restriction patch from
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #4)
> Did you apply the PA ICF aliasing restriction patch from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33843?
Yes, I have it in my tree. Yet I still get t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #4 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3)
> I'd like to help, but it's such a mess. There is not one PR per distinct
> issue, but various things reported in long threads.
>
> Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #2 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #0)
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33915 from
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534#c55
>
> for disabling nonlocal goto receiver and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
43 matches
Mail list logo
