http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't aware of this bug report until today.
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #1)
> This is an unresolvable problem.
>
> If we made __builtin_frame_address(N > 0) a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
This is an unresolvable problem.
If we made __builtin_frame_address(N > 0) always return 0, then some useful use
cases for debugging would be excluded.
On the other hand, it is impossible to know whether
