[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2021-08-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2014-11-15 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Nov 15 19:46:14 2014 New Revision: 217611 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217611&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/60104 * gcc.target/i386/sibcall-1.c: Don't

[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2014-11-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2014-11-15 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 --- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Testcase gcc.target/i386/sibcall-1.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin14 (compiled with "-O2 -m32"). Assembler code generated is: .section __TEXT,__text_cold,regular,pure_instructions LCOLDB0: .

[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2014-09-14 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug target/60104] load not folded into indirect branch on x86-64

2014-05-30 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60104 --- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Fri May 30 18:00:11 2014 New Revision: 211089 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/60104 * config/i386/i386.c (x86_output_mi_thunk): Add memory