https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
vgrebinski at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to vgrebin...@gmail.com from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> > Checked that this works with current gcc-6/5/4.9. Can this be closed now?
>
> I'm fine to close i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
--- Comment #5 from vgrebinski at gmail dot com
---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> Checked that this works with current gcc-6/5/4.9. Can this be closed now?
I'm fine to close it since the bug is fixed in 4.9 and up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Checked that this works with current gcc-6/5/4.9. Can this be closed now?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
C testcase
void omb(int n, double *points, double *weights)
{
int i;
for(i=0;i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|amd64/sandy bridge |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status|
