[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- You can write r201005 and bugzilla will link it for you :-)

[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 --- Comment #6 from Yvan Roux --- Nice feature, I'll try to remember it ;) Thanks

[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 Yvan Roux changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 --- Comment #3 from Yvan Roux --- Validation ends without any regression on ARM targets (armv5, a9, a9hf, a15).

[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 --- Comment #2 from Yvan Roux --- Created attachment 30511 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30511&action=edit a first fix

[Bug target/57909] [ARM] ICE with internal memcpy and -mno-unaligned-access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57909 --- Comment #1 from Yvan Roux --- The issue is that an UNSPEC_UNALIGNED_LOAD insn is emitted whereas the flag -mno-unaligned-access is passed, which implies that this insn is not recognized. The generation of the unaligned load is made in the gen