[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

2013-12-03 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

2013-11-13 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

2013-07-03 Thread azanella at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 --- Comment #2 from Adhemerval Zanella --- You are correct and I meant in my first comment QNaN for the NaN work. And I believe the patch is still correct: for IBM long double SNaN will be represented by first double being the NaN (the second doub

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

2013-07-02 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1