http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #9 from thutt at vmware dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Since glibc controls the headers we (GCC) project cannot do anything.
???
>From your standpoint of having cpp produce different output, I understand
you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
thutt at vmware dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to thutt from comment #5)
> Is there simple explanation for the difference in behavior?
Is the preprocessed source the same? I bet glibc enables some inline function
at -O1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #5 from thutt at vmware dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to thutt from comment #2)
> > Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is
> > disabled?
> > SSE is an x86-specific hard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Dup of PR 55185 which asks for the error to be delayed until the problematic
function is really called?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to thutt from comment #2)
> Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is
> disabled?
> SSE is an x86-specific hardware implementation and has nothing to do with
> language val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
--- Comment #2 from thutt at vmware dot com ---
Can you please explain why it's invalid to return a double if SSE is disabled?
SSE is an x86-specific hardware implementation and has nothing to do with
language validity from my standpoint.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Status|UN