http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55461
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55461
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-25 18:48:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That's a design not matching the hardware then -- read up on reformatting
> penalties.
>
> Also the way the rule in the md file is written it more lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55461
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen 2012-11-25
18:07:49 UTC ---
That's a design not matching the hardware then -- read up on reformatting
penalties.
Also the way the rule in the md file is written it more looks like a bug to me.
It seems to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55461
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-25 08:59:13
UTC ---
This is by design, movups is one byte shorter than movupd.
