http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55147
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-31
16:07:11 UTC ---
For the testcase from this PR it creates better assembly actually (compared to
with the #c1 patch, without that it is both longer and wrong). That is because
when bswapdi is sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55147
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-10-31 15:47:46
UTC ---
> can fix the reg overlap problem between address of operands[1] and high part
> of
> operands[0]. That said, I wonder what is the advantage of having bswapdi2
> patter on i?86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55147
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
