[Bug target/55012] Protected visibility wrongly uses GOT-relative addresses

2025-01-29 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012 Bug 55012 depends on bug 19520, which changed state. Bug 19520 Summary: protected function pointer and copy relocation don't work right https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/55012] Protected visibility wrongly uses GOT-relative addresses

2015-03-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/55012] Protected visibility wrongly uses GOT-relative addresses

2012-10-21 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55012 --- Comment #1 from Rich Felker 2012-10-21 22:06:39 UTC --- I'm not sure whether the fix should be in gcc/varasm.c, default_binds_local_p_1(), or in the config/i386/predicates.md, local_symbolic_operand predicate. In the former, all non