https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #9 from Ulrich Weigand ---
I just noticed that this bug has disappeared on mainline. Binary search showed
that this happens with rev. 211007, which checks in this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01263.html
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #8 from Dan Horák ---
for the record - ICE still present in gcc version 4.9.1 20140813 (Red Hat
4.9.1-7) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák ---
FYI the error is still present in
gcc version 4.8.0 20130412 (Red Hat 4.8.0-2) (GCC)
Target: s390-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.7.4
--- Comment #5 from Rich
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #2 from Ulrich Weigand 2012-07-04
17:17:22 UTC ---
The problem with this is that there was a reason why I originally supported
only a single constant pool reference per instruction: there needs to be an
upper bound on the number of by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-07-04
13:15:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 27742
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27742
gcc48-pr53854.patch
Untested fix.
10 matches
Mail list logo
