http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth 2012-02-17 09:41:20 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 17 09:41:13 2012
New Revision: 184330
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184330
Log:
Increase simulate-thread timeout (PR target/51753)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-10 15:28:17 UTC ---
> With this fixed, all but the
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-load-int128.c -O0 -g thread simulation
> test
>
> failures (at all optimization levels) wer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 18:09:45 UTC ---
> Please look at gcc.log files in your testsuite directory. There are extensive
> single-instruction traces to analyse what went wrong. Comparing your traces to
> l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2012-01-30 18:47:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > I'm uncertain if this is a code generation issue or a problem on the gdb
> > side.
>
> The problem still occurs unchanged with gdb 7.4. Uros, do you have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-01-30 17:26:47 UTC ---
> I'm uncertain if this is a code generation issue or a problem on the gdb side.
The problem still occurs unchanged with gdb 7.4. Uros, do you have
suggestions ho
