[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

2011-08-12 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 --- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-08-12 16:58:13 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Fri Aug 12 16:58:09 2011 New Revision: 177705 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177705 Log: Fix PR target/48328 part 1 Modified:

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

2011-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

2011-04-05 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Severity|normal

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

2011-04-04 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization St

[Bug target/48328] GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table

2011-03-30 Thread carrot at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328 --- Comment #1 from Carrot 2011-03-30 07:25:31 UTC --- Another possible enhancement is we can also use HImode jump table entries. Similar to cases min<0, although tbh is not available in arm mode, we can use separate instruction to load offset an