http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-24 16:29:24
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Thu Mar 24 16:29:18 2011
New Revision: 171404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171404
Log:
2011-03-24 Steve Ellcey
PR target/48209
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-22 21:05:32 UTC ---
> Yes, I can do that. Do you know how the test fails on HP-UX 10.*?
> Does it fail to compile or does it compile and then fail during execution like
> it does on HP-UX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |sje at gcc dot gnu.org
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-22 19:01:21 UTC ---
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, sje at cup dot hp.com wrote:
> In running this test on IA64 and x86, the first call is the only one that I
> see
> getting inlined on both platfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 17:13:29
UTC ---
OK, that is what I was missing. I didn't notice there was a second test to
check for that, sorry for the confusion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-22
17:07:08 UTC ---
We have gcc.dg/pr47917.c test for that purpose.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 16:59:03
UTC ---
I guess we disagree on what the test should be doing. I agree that it is a
valid test for showing that nothing gets broken when doing the optimization,
but it is not a test that shows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-22
16:31:12 UTC ---
I strongly disagree. The test is testing also whether the optimization works
correctly. Feel free to xfail the test on targets that don't have C99
compliant snprintf, but on targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 16:20:15
UTC ---
I agree. The test is not verifying whether or not snprintf is getting inlined
and that was what bug 47917 was about. This should be a compile test that
looks for snprintf in the assem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-21 23:03:11 UTC ---
> It looks like this is broken for HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23. On 11.31 there is a
> object that can be linked in (unix2003.o) to fix this. Just like we
> currently
> lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #2 from
12 matches
Mail list logo
