[Bug target/47269] DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle

2011-02-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-06 02:15:08 UTC --- Mike, I thought it was pretty clear in the man page... -gtoggle Turn off generation of debug info, if leaving out this option would have generated it, o

[Bug target/47269] DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle

2011-02-05 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269 --- Comment #3 from Mike Stump 2011-02-06 01:31:52 UTC --- If I understand what they intend, though, the documentation isn't clear on this point: %{!gtoggle: %{gdwarf-2:%{!gstabs*:%{!g0: -idsym}}}\

[Bug target/47269] DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle

2011-02-05 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269 --- Comment #2 from Mike Stump 2011-02-06 01:10:06 UTC --- Luckily specs can do this: %{!fdump=*:%{!fsyntax-only:foo}} says to put in foo, if those two flags are not given; this is and.

[Bug target/47269] DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle

2011-01-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-13 05:23:00 UTC --- This seems impossible to implement without the addition of a logical AND to the spec language and the ability to place parentheses. We have two cases which have to be tested as true...