[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #19

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu --- My current patches are at https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/condjmp/v7?ref_type=heads They passed GCC bootstrap and tests on x86-64.

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- My current patches are at https://gitlab.com/x86-gcc/gcc/-/tree/users/hjl/condjmp/master?ref_type=heads

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60458|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60457|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 60458 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60458&action=edit A patch to fold jump table with tests I got [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr47253]$ cat j.c void bar0 (void); void bar1 (void); vo

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60454|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60448|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60446|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #60445|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 60445 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60445&action=edit A patch [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr47253]$ cat y.c void t(), f(); void decide(bool ok) { if (ok) t(); else f(); }

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2025-02-08 Thread janschultke at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 Jan Schultke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janschultke at googlemail dot com --- Co

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2023-05-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chfast at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 f

[Bug target/47253] Conditional jump to tail function is not generated

2021-08-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jay.foad at gmail dot com --- Comment #6