http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-31 21:17:40 UTC ---
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> C and C++ frontends each have their own, different versions of these
> functions, but then these functions are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-31 20:35:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I objected to a previous patch version using the weak attribute and
> thought that a way was found at that point to do without it. There's no
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-31 20:03:27 UTC ---
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> There are a lot more problems with this port. Here is a patch that makes
> the port sort-of build when using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-31 19:51:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 22875
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22875
tentative patch
There are a lot more problems with this port. Here is a patch that makes
t
