[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2011-02-02 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #10 from Diego Novillo 2011-02-02 17:40:46 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Wed Feb 2 17:40:40 2011 New Revision: 169536 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169536 Log: Visit basic blocks using the work-list based al

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2011-01-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2011-01-24 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-24 17:30:00 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jan 24 17:29:58 2011 New Revision: 169173 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169173 Log: Visit basic blocks using the work-list based

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-12-30 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-30 13:12:05 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Dec 30 13:12:02 2010 New Revision: 168342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168342 Log: Repeat processing all basic blocks for vzero

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-24 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 19:16:48 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 24 19:16:40 2010 New Revision: 167126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167126 Log: Don't check TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in ix86_expan

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-24 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 18:24:46 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 24 18:24:39 2010 New Revision: 167124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167124 Log: Improve vzeroupper optimization. gcc/ 2010

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-18 01:48:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 22437 [details] > A testcase > > With -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -mavx: > > movlToken_Id(%rip), %eax > vmovapd 32(%rsp

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-18 00:26:18 UTC --- Created attachment 22437 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22437 A testcase With -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -mavx: movlToken_Id(%rip), %eax vmovap

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 18:49:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does the patch at [1] also fix this test? > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01802.html No, that is for a different case.

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

2010-11-17 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-17 18:42:29 UTC --- Does the patch at [1] also fix this test? [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01802.html