[Bug target/45299] Dwarf information is wrong with optimised code.

2010-08-28 Thread hariharans at picochip dot com
--- Comment #9 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 17:17 --- Fixed on mainline. -- hariharans at picochip dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug target/45299] Dwarf information is wrong with optimised code.

2010-08-28 Thread hariharans at picochip dot com
--- Comment #8 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 16:15 --- Created an attachment (id=21585) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21585&action=view) Patch to fix the problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45299

[Bug target/45299] Dwarf information is wrong with optimised code.

2010-08-28 Thread hariharans at picochip dot com
--- Comment #7 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 16:14 --- picochip is a vliw processor and reorder_var_tracking_notes tries to move debug instructions from middle of vliw instructions out. There was a bug in that which resulted in this problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug target/45299] Dwarf information is wrong with optimised code.

2010-08-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 10:06 --- Sounds like a target bug. After variable_tracking_main the notes look correct: (note 88 23 89 2 (var_location array (reg:HI 0 R0 [ pass_through_array ])) NOTE_INSN_VAR_LOCATION) (note 89 88 90 2 (var_location size (re