https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-31
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #4)
> Incorrect bug.
Correct place was bug 84628 comment #6, for any confused onlookers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #4 from Jay ---
Incorrect bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
--- Comment #3 from Jay ---
But, the thing is, because optimization can remove the use of such functions,
people are now advocating that we noinline along with the attribute, which
hypothetically is unwarranted damage. Noinline being a partial di
adian cross, copying it to the system, and it
wouldn't run because I didn't have the environment variables correct.
Thank you,
- Jay
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 5:09 PM
To: jay.kr...@cornell.edu
Subject: [Bug target/44002] need to #include unistd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44002
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
