[Bug target/43862] GCC doesn't use 16-bit armv5te multiplies when possible

2011-08-23 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43862 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug target/43862] GCC doesn't use 16-bit armv5te multiplies when possible

2010-04-28 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 10:06 --- * I don't see why smulbb, smultb, smulbt, smultt shouldn't be generated for their respective cases. So, yes that's correct. * smulwy is not supported in the backend, so that's a feature enhancement * smlawy is again

[Bug target/43862] GCC doesn't use 16-bit armv5te multiplies when possible

2010-04-22 Thread lessen42+gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from lessen42+gcc at gmail dot com 2010-04-23 03:03 --- Created an attachment (id=20467) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20467&action=view) smul/smla in C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43862