http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leopardboy2 at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-26 20:16:22
UTC ---
Both gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.6 with that patch applied compile memtest.i properly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #25 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-01 19:36:06
UTC ---
Applied the diff from svn r172920 to the Debian gcc-4.6 source package as well;
let’s see whether this works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4
--- Comment #24 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
--- Comment #20 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #19 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-10-23 17:43:59
UTC ---
I could build gcc-4.4 on Debian with it, and the patch has been included
into the package since. No testsuite runs with it, though – I will do it
on real hardware whose usage I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #18 fr
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29
---
GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-10 19:49
---
Thanks Andreas. I don't have access to m68k-elfy targets these days, so could
someone test it just to be sure? I'll commit if everything goes OK.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #15 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-03 20:17 ---
The patch is ok, please check it in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 09:55
---
Created an attachment (id=20541)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20541&action=view)
proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 09:53
---
Subject: Re: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands
"mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes:
> --- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 10:20
> ---
> The
--- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:03
---
Ping.
Richard S.,
Andreas,
Any comment on the above analysis?
AFAICT, the "T" constraint should accept operands if "flag_pic &&
!TARGET_PCREL".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:02
---
Created an attachment (id=20536)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20536&action=view)
Revert previous patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
16 matches
Mail list logo
