https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23718|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
AssignedTo|meissner at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 18:11 ---
arm-elf is in maintenance only mode. Marking it as P4 -
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 10:48 ---
I don't see this with an arm-none-eabi or indeed an arm-linux-gnueabi target.
Is there any reason why you are still using the arm-elf target rather than
moving to the eabi configurations ?
cheers
Ramana
--
raman
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-01 17:28 ---
This looks like a middle-end or target specific problem.
Changed component from libfortran to target.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
