[Bug target/41176] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

2009-10-01 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-10-01 19:43 --- No ICE with 4.3.3, either, but there is an ICE with Target: ppc64-redhat-linux gcc version 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) (GCC) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176

[Bug target/41176] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

2009-10-01 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #4 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-10-01 19:37 --- There is no ICE when compiling thread.i with gcc-4.2.4: [luc...@lambda-head ~/Desktop]$ /pkgs/gcc-4.2.4/libexec/gcc/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.4/cc1 -fpreprocessed thread.i -quiet -mcpu=970 -m64 -O1 -Wno-un

[Bug target/41176] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

2009-10-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-10-01 16:39 --- Can you check if this problem is a regression from 4.2+? Although ICEs are not welcomed, regression status would put more weight on the PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41176

[Bug target/41176] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

2009-09-02 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-09-03 02:37 --- I thought Vlad's scheduling/register allocation patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg3.html which solves PR24319, might fix this problem, but it does not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug target/41176] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands at postreload.c:396

2009-08-26 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #1 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-08-27 00:14 --- Created an attachment (id=18431) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18431&action=view) preprocessed source file I'm not having much luck cutting this down more, sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org