--- Comment #7 from anmol at freescale dot com 2009-04-29 17:29 ---
Respun testcase per advice from Joseph S. Myers:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg02363.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39565
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 14:55 ---
Subject: Bug 39565
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Apr 29 14:54:54 2009
New Revision: 146972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146972
Log:
2009-04-29 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-0
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 12:06 ---
I think this PR can now be closed.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 39565
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 29 08:34:21 2009
New Revision: 146928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146928
Log:
2009-04-29 Anmol P. Paralkar
PR target/39565
--- Comment #3 from anmol at freescale dot com 2009-04-28 23:43 ---
I verified with native GCC on target: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu on:
gcc version 4.5.0 20090423 (experimental) [trunk revision 146648] (GCC)
gcc version 4.4.1 20090424 (prerelease) [gcc-4_4-branch revision 146746] (G
--- Comment #2 from edmar at freescale dot com 2009-03-27 15:01 ---
I noticed that too. On x86_64 there is no undefined symbol either.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39565
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-27 09:19 ---
I get
t.o: file format elf32-i386
SYMBOL TABLE:
ldf *ABS* t.c
ld .text .text
ld .data .data
ld .bss .bss
