[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2015-03-12 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39429 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #9 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-13 13:07 --- Created an attachment (id=18186) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18186&action=view) fix arith_adjacentmem LDM splitting code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39429

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #8 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-13 13:05 --- Mystery solved. Buried in revision 146451, which should just fix enum conversions for C++ compatibility, is the following bug fix: --- trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c 2009/04/20 19:30:55 146450 +++ trunk/gcc/config/arm/a

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-12 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #7 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-12 23:58 --- Revision 146451 on 4.5 changed it from generating broken code to generating not-so-broken code. That's completely unexpected since that revision is a enable-bootstrap-with-c++ thing which isn't supposed to change any beha

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-12 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #6 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-12 21:21 --- (In reply to comment #5) > What options did you use ? Did you use -O2 , -O3 or -Os with the testcase > you've added here ? I don't see the problem with 4.5.0 trunk 149479 with > either > -mcpu=arm740t or with arm7tdmi

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-12 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-12 20:51 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=18179) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18179&action=view) [edit] > reduced test case in plain C > What options did you use ? Did you use -O2

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-12 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-12 11:29 --- Created an attachment (id=18179) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18179&action=view) reduced test case in plain C -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39429

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-07-11 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-07-11 20:20 --- It seems that cpu type and tuning options make a difference here. If I compile with -mcpu and -mtune referring to a cpu that does not imply FL_LDSCHED, such as arm740t, then I get the broken code that clobbers r0 before l

[Bug target/39429] compiler create bad asm codes.

2009-03-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3 |P2 http