--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-05 22:03 ---
5% is way below our release criteria threshold. P4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 14:33 ---
I would say this needs a much more detailed pipeline description. (btw, what
is diffed against what? i.e. which variant is faster? ;))
As we have %r9 and %r9d access I would say this may be some artifacts in
HW re
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-01-31 14:19 ---
Unfortunately, I do not see any reason why the two should have different speed
(which means there's no way to teach GCC the former is better).
I think a WONTFIX is the only possibility. CCing a release manager.
--
bonz
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37367
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 21:43 ---
Sounds like a scheduler issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
