--- Comment #20 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 22:46 ---
Bug 27016 is another example of poor IVOPTS due to poor choices in
arm_arm_address_cost
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #19 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 14:58 ---
Interesting: for " -march=armv5te -mthumb" the code after IVOPTS is the perfect
code (from e.g. comment #17). The reason is that the address cost function for
Thumb (arm_thumb_address_cost) is of course not the same
