--- Comment #15 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-04-21 07:18 ---
Closed as invalid.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIR
--- Comment #14 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-23 00:38
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The Ubuntu 7.10 features should have been matched.
>
> Maybe this is a problem with building in the src dir.
>
> Can you try building GCC in an object directory?
>
That fixed it on
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-22 22:08
---
The Ubuntu 7.10 features should have been matched.
Maybe this is a problem with building in the src dir.
Can you try building GCC in an object directory?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619
--- Comment #12 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-22 22:02
---
Created an attachment (id=15363)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15363&action=view)
centos-4.6, glibc-2.3.4, features.h
as requested, from a patched system.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #11 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-22 22:00
---
Created an attachment (id=15362)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15362&action=view)
Centos-5.1, glibc-2.5, features.h
as requested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619
--- Comment #10 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-22 21:58
---
Created an attachment (id=15361)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15361&action=view)
Ubuntu 7.10 (fully patched) glibc-2.6.1 features.h
As requested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
--- Comment #9 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-19 20:38
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of:
> > __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream))
> >
>
> So how would I fix it?(In reply to comment #
--- Comment #8 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-18 00:02
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of:
> __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream))
>
So how would I fix it?(In reply to comment #6)
> Looks like the reason why it was
--- Comment #7 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 23:44
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of:
> __NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream))
>
So how would I fix it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:58 ---
Looks like the reason why it was not being fixed because of:
__NTH (feof_unlocked (FILE *__stream))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619
--- Comment #5 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:13
---
Created an attachment (id=15340)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15340&action=view)
bits/stdio.h
This is the correct file as requested, I'll attempt to delete the previous
wrong version.
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=15339)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15339&action=view) [edit]
> stdio.h as requested.
That is /usr/include/stdio.h, not the one I requested
--- Comment #3 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:06
---
rpm claims:
glibc-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39
compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30
ls -al /lib/libc-2.3.4.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1516768 Nov 16 08:37 /lib/libc-2.3.4.so
--
htt
--- Comment #2 from bill at cse dot ucdavis dot edu 2008-03-17 22:05
---
Created an attachment (id=15339)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15339&action=view)
stdio.h as requested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35619
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 22:00 ---
This is a bug in the glibc headers. We should fixincludes them though.
Can you attach /usr/include/bits/stdio.h ? And also mention which glibc
version you are using.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
15 matches
Mail list logo
