[Bug target/35296] init_expr_once suboptimal for Thumb

2017-07-26 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35296 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/35296] init_expr_once suboptimal for Thumb

2009-06-22 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35296

[Bug target/35296] init_expr_once suboptimal for Thumb

2009-05-12 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 11:36 --- Sorry, I don't know. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35296

[Bug target/35296] init_expr_once suboptimal for Thumb

2009-05-12 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 10:05 --- init_expr_once is now renamed to init_expr_target, though I see that the comments / code you refer to in the bug report still exist . Can you give any examples of optimizations that might be enabled if we went ahead a