--- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26
12:41 ---
Fully resolved with...
r142121 | uros | 2008-11-22 09:16:57 -0500 (Sat, 22 Nov 2008) | 18 lines
PR target/38222
*
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-09-26
14:38 ---
No, I never got a message that any of the originally reported sse4 gcc test
cases
were fixed. I simply noticed it during testing. The radar report is still open
though. Feel free to open a duplicate to try
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 14:19 ---
> The remaining failure in the sse4_2-popcntl.c testcase has been reported
> for awhile on radar (ID 5650346). Like the previous errors these are most
> likely assembler bugs.
Jack,
Did you get any feedback fro
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-09-26
14:00 ---
Dominique,
The remaining failure in the sse4_2-popcntl.c testcase has been reported
for awhile on radar (ID 5650346). Like the previous errors these are most
likely assembler bugs.
--
http://gcc.g
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 08:00 ---
Comment #9 was for -m32, with -m64 the failures are
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c compilation failed to produce
executable
FAIL: gcc.target
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 07:34 ---
With Xcode 3.1.1 all the failures disappeared but
gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c compilation failed to prod
--- Comment #8 from ismail at namtrac dot org 2008-03-01 21:41 ---
I think its reasonable to close this bug as invalid, do you agree? Meanwhile we
can bug Apple Gcc guys to take a stab at this.
Thanks,
ismail
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34497
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-03-01
21:36 ---
No official response yet although Mike Stump agrees that it is probably a bug
in their assembler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34497
--- Comment #6 from ismail at namtrac dot org 2008-03-01 21:18 ---
Jack,
Did Apple give any reply on this. Is this their bug? If so we better close the
gcc bug as invalid.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34497
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-12-16
21:27 ---
Filed as Radar Problem ID: 5650346.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34497
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-12-16
20:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14783)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14783&action=view)
assembly file from sse3_1-insertps-2.c testcase on i686-apple-darwin9
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2007-12-16
20:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=14782)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14782&action=view)
preprocessed source file from sse3_1-insertps-2.c testcase on
i686-apple-darwin9
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 19:23 ---
This might be a bug in Apple's assembler.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
13 matches
Mail list logo