https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Pfaller ---
On 07/27/2017 02:34 AM, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
>
> Eric Gallager changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
--- Comment #6 from leo at marco dot de 2009-03-19 19:08 ---
Subject: Re: gcc generates incorrect trampoline code in
thumb mode
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-19 10:15 ---
> Matthias,
>
> I think Laurent was asking f
--- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-19 10:15 ---
Matthias,
I think Laurent was asking for an executable test case, which fails before your
test and succeeds after, so that it can enter the regression suite.
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from leo at marco dot de 2009-03-17 16:47 ---
Subject: Re: gcc generates incorrect trampoline code in
thumb mode
laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
> --- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 12:29 ---
> This needs a testcase
>
>
Testcase:
void
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-01-02 12:29 ---
This needs a testcase
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCO
--- Comment #2 from leo at marco dot de 2007-07-20 11:55 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
I forgot to mention that this happens only for thumb mode.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
--- Comment #1 from leo at marco dot de 2007-07-20 11:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=13943)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13943&action=view)
fix for the reported bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
