https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greened at obbligato dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kerrg at ccs dot neu.edu
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwxr-xr-x at gmx dot de
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #10 from Raphaël JAKSE ---
So, a long term solution would be to allow quoted function names with the call
instruction in gas?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #9 from Harald van Dijk ---
Oh, very sorry about that, I hadn't realised clang stopped using gas. clang
uses its own assembler now, which supports quoted names this as a syntax
extension. Now that there is a possible syntax already, p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #8 from Raphaël JAKSE ---
I tried
call"$"
instead of
call($)
With gcc -S, I got :
t.s: Assembler messages:
t.s:30: Error: invalid character `"' before operand 1
I don't know if there is a way to use quoting (" ") i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #7 from Harald van Dijk ---
That's good to know. Trying some more, clang does manage to get even weirder
symbol names right, because gas does have a form of quoting already, and clang
makes use of it.
int x __asm__(")");
int main() {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
Raphaël JAKSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.jakse at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
funto66 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||funto66 at gmail dot com
--- Co
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-05-02 12:58 ---
Subject: Re: Invalid assembly code on initial dollar signs
On Wed, 2 May 2007, truedfx at gentoo dot org wrote:
> Thanks for the link. I don't see how GAS could be fixed, though. How would the
> assembler tell the
--- Comment #3 from truedfx at gentoo dot org 2007-05-02 05:58 ---
Thanks for the link. I don't see how GAS could be fixed, though. How would the
assembler tell the difference between $0 the constant and $0 the identifier?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31782
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 03:33 ---
> unless $ also becomes an invalid identifier in C.
Well read:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.1.2/gcc/Dollar-Signs.html
it is can be but does not have to be.
This works for me targetting spu-elf and powerpc64
14 matches
Mail list logo
